25 June 2011

More on the two forthcoming 'Hobbit' films

From The American Prospect:

Jackson is filming The Hobbit as a two-part prequel to The Lord of the Rings, and as such, the film will feature many of the same characters. In particular, Ian McClellan, Hugo Weaving, Cate Blanchett, Christopher Lee and Orlando Bloom, and Elijah Wood will reprise their respective roles (Gandalf, Elrond, Galadriel, Saruman, Legolas and Frodo Baggins), despite their thin or nonexistent presence in the book.

Fans of The Hobbit might cry foul at the inclusion of these characters (particularly Frodo, who isn’t even alive at the time of Bilbo’s journey), but they’re in line with J.R.R Tolkien’s stance toward his work. The Hobbit was originally written as a standalone story that took place in the mythology Tolkien had developed years earlier (and would continue to develop over the course of his life). The novel’s huge success prompted Tolkien’s publishers to ask for a sequel, which he subsequently commenced. This sequel would eventually become The Lord of the Rings, and its substantial departure from The Hobbit prompted Tolkien to make revisions to the original story, in an effort to better align the stories. Via Wikipedia, here is one prominent change made in later editions of The Hobbit:

In the first edition of The Hobbit, Gollum willingly bets his magic ring on the outcome of the riddle-game, and he and Bilbo part amicably. In the second edition edits, in order to reflect the new concept of the ring and its corrupting abilities, Tolkien made Gollum more aggressive towards Bilbo and distraught at losing the ring. The encounter ends with Gollum’s curse, “Thief! Thief, Baggins! We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!” This sets the stage for Gollum’s portrayal in The Lord of the Rings.

In the same vein, Peter Jackson’s additions are an attempt to add more and greater continuity between the two film series. For my part, I’m very excited to see what Jackson does with this element of Tolkien’s mythology.

That’s a pretty positive perspective (spin?) on what Jackson is doing with these two films. Nonetheless, I too am starting to get excited to see these films.


  1. I can't wait to see The Hobbit! Some of the liberties that he takes with story is a bit disenchanting but I won't judge until I see how it works. I wonder if he'll include the driving out of the Necromancer from Mirkwood?

  2. Atom Kid, Jackson has been quite explicit that the Necromancer plotline is going to be the bulk of the additions.

  3. Gandalf and Elrond were both in the Hobbit.

  4. Quite right, Dan. Strange that the author lumped them in with Galadriel, et al.

  5. Thanks for that info, Rob Barrett. Including the White Council's assault on the Necromancer is an addition I can support! Indeed, the prospect of seeing it depicted in the films is quite exciting (and explains the inclusion of Galadriel and Saruman, at least).

  6. Unfortunately, PJ still has plenty of room to screw up - expect to see Legolas win the Battle of Five Armies for the good side!

    We all saw how he screwed up RoTK, didn't we?

  7. Legolas winning the battle on the side of good? Sacrilegious! But unlikely. we'll probably see the Eagles showing up to save the day, at great cost.

    What next, Dwarven armies at the battle of five armies, wielding mattocks?

    Jackson's changes did not impair my enjoyment of the LOTR trilogy.

  8. For me, the last movie is almost unbearable to watch. There are some good points, to be sure, but the bad points far outweigh them. It's just the lost opportunity to make a good movie after doing so well with the first one, that is annoying.


Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
I'm a Canadian political philosopher who divides his time between Milwaukee and Toronto.